The Northside Park Sawmill

Some 200 years ago, a sawmill sat in what is now Northside Park in Vienna. I haven’t seen this sawmill referred to in various accounts of mills in Fairfax County and the Vienna area, and I don’t know when exactly the mill operated. But the existing evidence–even though there are only a few items of such evidence–indicates that a sawmill did indeed sit next to Piney Branch probably on land that today is part of Northside Park.

The most helpful evidence for the sawmill’s existence is the plat in Figure 1. The plat is available as a document in the files for a Fairfax County chancery case, George W. Gunnell Committee of Bushrod Gunnell vs. the extended Gunnell family. The plat shows the partition of a 174-acre property almost entirely on one side of Piney Branch. The sawmill is adjacent to Piney Branch just after a bend in the stream within the boundaries of the 54-acre Lot 1 of the partition (see Figures 1 & 2).

Figure 1 shows a plat from January 1854 from surveyor A.B. Williams. Lots 1, 2, and 3 extend from the bottom right to the top left and cover 174 acres.
Figure 2: Inset 1 shows that A.B. Williams, the surveyor who drew up the plat, labeled the stream as “Piny Branch.” Inset 2 show that his annotation of a feature on the right bank of Piny Branch within Lot 1 is for a “saw mill.”

We can establish where exactly Lot 1 was by comparing the shape on the plat to the shape of tracts in the Beth Mitchell map of Fairfax County’s 1860 property owners. Lot 1 corresponds to the property owned in 1860 by Ashbel Hosford, of which a portion is now Town of Vienna park land (see Figure 3 comparison map). The plat itself is oriented with north at the top, judging from the comparison to the Mitchell map.

Figure 3 uses Beth Mitchell’s map of 1860 Fairfax County property owners (right) to determine the location of Lot 1 in the 1854 plat (left). Mitchell superimposed 1860 property lines on a 1980s-era Fairfax County tax map. On her map I’ve added four features in larger black type, e.g. “Town Line,” to help orient the reader to the location of the parcel. The text circled in pink reads, “Town of Vienna Park,” referring to Northside Park. On the plat, I’ve labeled the north-south creek upon which Point C is located.

Thus the sawmill was on the east side of Piney Branch, apparently just after a big bend in the stream. On the plat, the mill is between the bend and a creek that empties into Piney Branch from south to north, at the southeastern extremity of Lot 1. The creek was known at the time as Garrett’s Spring Branch, according to deeds from the mid-19th century (V3:51; U3:62) (see Figures 4 and 5).

Figure 4 is about Garrett’s Spring Branch. The inset shows on a modern-era contour map the probable location of the creek known in the mid-19th century as Garrett’s Spring Branch, circled in purple. The green lines on the map correspond to the approximate boundaries of Lot 1, judging from current map features and distances described in deeds from the 1850s.
Figure 5: This aerial image is from 1937, roughly at the halfway point between today (2024) and when A.B. Williams drew up his plat in 1854. As such, it probably provides a better sense than today’s maps of the exact course of Piney Branch as it was in 1854. Piney Branch is the black linear feature inside the green lines. However, what was later known as the Washington and Old Dominion Railroad was built within a few years of the plat, and with it, the immediate topography probably underwent some significant changes. For instance, the construction of the railroad embankment at the center of the image probably created what was known in the mid-20th century as “Black Pond.” The 1937 image also shows what was probably Garrett’s Spring Branch. Garrett’s Spring Branch should be the faint black line running from bottom center to the northeast in the direction of Piney Branch and the railroad embankment that since 1857 has bordered the stream.

A modern-day contour map helps to narrow down the likely location of the mill. With two good-sized hills just to the east of Piney Branch at the big bend in the stream, we’re left with a rough triangle of relatively level ground on the east bank.

Figure 6: The sawmill probably sat somewhere within the red triangle on the flood plain bordered by Piney Branch to the west and high ground to the north and east, judging from the annotation on the Williams plat and the local topography. A less likely alternative would be to the east of Point D and on the right bank of Piney Branch in the relatively level area of the flood plain, in the vicinity of the pink “X.”

When Did the Mill Run & Who Was Associated With It?

I assume the mill was probably operating during the early-19th-century ownership of Henry Gunnell, who died in 1822 and whose tenure seems to have an aspect of stability to it. Perhaps the mill also operated for as much as three decades beyond that. Two deeds from sales of Lot 1 in 1854 note that the parcel was “commonly known as the saw mill lot” (see Figure 7). That description is consistent with the plat’s annotation for a sawmill and suggests that the sawmill had a longtime association with the lot, presumably dating to Henry’s ownership (Fairfax County deeds V3:51 and W3:24). Henry Gunnell’s ownership began circa 1805, when he acquired 190 acres from Thomas Fairfax for $40, judging from Fairfax County’s list of deeds from the era. In his 1821 will, Henry Gunnell bequeathed these “190 acres bought of Thomas Fairfax in two parcels on the waters of Piney branch and broad glade” to sons Bushrod and Joshua (M1:301). The 190 acres included the 174 acres from which Lot 1 would later be partitioned, judging from the records of chancery case 1868-001.

Figure 7 is from an 1854 deed transferring the parcel surrounding the mill from John Dyer to Ashbel Hosford (W3:24). This is one of the three textual references to the sawmill that I’ve found, complementing the graphical evidence in the A.B. Williams plat. Marjorie Lundegard’s survey of Fairfax County mills mentions that Henry Gunnell operated a mill, but she categorizes it as a grist mill, indicating that it was not our sawmill of interest.

Lot 1 and the 174-acre tract of which it had been a part appear to have been in an unsettled state for years after Henry Gunnell’s death, leaving it unclear to me if the sawmill operated during this period. By 1832, Bushrod Gunnell had become mentally ill, and his brother George W. Gunnell committed him, judging from chancery records. That same year, Joshua Gunnell sued to divide up the various parcels he and Bushrod had received jointly in their father’s will. Under the division ordered by the court in 1832 or 1833, Bushrod received the parcel of which the future Lot 1 would be a part. In the meantime, tenant Henson Kidwell, aka William H. Kidwell, had been living on the 190-acre tract, according to chancery records. I have been unable to determine if Kidwell or someone else associated with the Gunnell family was operating the mill in these years.

And similarly for the remainder of the 1830s and 1840s and into the 1850s. In 1847, George W. Gunnell reported to the court that on Bushrod’s behalf, he had sold what was now a 174-acre parcel, as the court had ordered. Dr. Ira Williams was the buyer. In a memorandum from late 1853, Williams wrote about a parcel “supposed to contain fifty nine acres & known as the Saw Mill tract” (Chancery Records Index Number 1868-001). This tract was part of a larger parcel that Williams had purchased from George W. Gunnell, committee of Bushrod Gunnell, according to the Williams memo. Williams was probably referring to what the subsequent survey would establish as the 54-acre lot. In January 1854, A.B. Williams–Ira’s brother–surveyed the land, and Ira partitioned it into three lots, with Lot 1 at 54 acres, rather than 59. The plat for this survey is the one annotated with the sawmill, indicating that as of early 1854, the mill still stood, whatever its operating status. In a series of transactions with a complicated chronology in early 1854, Ira Williams sold the 54 acres to Reuben A. Strother; George W. Gunnell, as a commissioner of the court and Bushrod’s committee, deeded the land to Strother; and Strother and his wife sold the parcel to John Dyer (Chancery Records Index Number 1868-001; V3:51; U3:62). In late 1854, Dyer then sold the parcel to Ashbel Hosford (W3:24).

It is in the sales to Dyer and Hosford that the deeds refer to the parcel as the sawmill lot, but neither gives a hint as to whether the sawmill was still operating. Hosford was a farmer from upstate New York. The only evidence we have of Hosford doing work other than farming during his ownership is that in 1857, he hauled material for the building of the nearby stretch of the Alexandria, Loudoun and Hampshire Railroad (the future Washington and Old Dominion), according to chancery records (Chancery Records Index Number 1858-037).

The construction of the railroad probably transformed the topography of the ground on the western side of Piney Branch opposite the mill location. In that area, what had probably been a more gradual descent of the land from what today is Center Street to the Piney Branch flood plain was now interrupted by the railroad embankment that exists to this day. The embankment creates a steep drop-off to Piney Branch. Regardless, after the Dyer-Hosford deed, the trail goes cold for the Northside Park sawmill.

The Site As It Looks Today

Figure 8 illustrates my approximation of where I took the subsequent photos (a. through f.) and their field of view. The notations for Photos c. and f. are in green type; the remainder are in blue.
Figure a. is the view towards what was probably the general area of the sawmill, circled in red. We are looking down from the northern hill and across the big bend in Piney Branch towards the W&OD and the embankment upon which it runs in this area.
Figure b. gets us closer to and within the general area of the probable mill (area enclosed in the red line). Piney Branch is out of view: behind us to the back right, then continuing out of view off the right side of the photo, and then screened with vegetation and too low for us to see as it meanders from right to left across the mid ground of the photo at the bottom of the W&OD embankment.
Figure c. provides a similar view as Figure b.
Figure d. shows us the ground bordered by a Northside Park trail, behind us out of view, and Piney Branch, running and twisting at the bottom of the embankment. During the growing season, the extent of the vegetation that has covered the area since the days of the sawmill would be even more obvious than is the case here.
Figure e looks down from the W&OD embankment onto the smaller bend in Piney Branch that then leads into the bigger bend as it develops at the left. The stream was running high at the time of the photo; the blue line shows its course. The sawmill was probably somewhere in the area encircled in red.
Figure f. shows where the creek once known as Garrett’s Spring Branch emerges from under the W&OD and empties into Piney Branch (culvert circled in blue). My only leads so far on the identity of Garrett: 1) Connie and Mayo Stuntz in “This Was Vienna, Virginia” refer to “Walter Garrett’s plantation,” which in context appears to have been along Lawyers Road west of Malcolm Road circa the early 1770s, and 2) today’s Garrett Street, off Lawyers Road outside Vienna.
Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to The Northside Park Sawmill

  1. Robby Manemann says:

    Very interesting research. Well done. Just recently found this website and am reading the articles. Appreciate the amount of time you put into the details.

  2. Carolyn Keehan says:

    I’m looking for information about Gunnell’s Mills, which is listed in the record of the 10th PA regiment during the Civil War. They went on an expedition there on 12/6/1861. Is this the place you are writing about? The 10th PA was in Fairfax County during the fall and winter of that year.

    • admin says:

      Thanks for reading. I don’t think the Northside Park mill is the place associated with the 10th PA Regiment on December 6th, 1861. From an 1865 history of the 10th Regt by Josiah R. Sypher, it looks like the unit’s action that day was at a Gunnell farm in what it today Great Falls. Sypher notes that on 6 December, General Ord’s brigade (of which the 10th PA was a part) marched in support of General Meade’s brigade, which was sent “to Gunnell’s farm, two miles and a half northeast of Dranesville, with instructions to capture two young men, nephews of Gunnell, and spies and murderers; also to bring in all the forage on the farm.” See here for the full details: https://archive.org/details/historypennsylv00esqgoog/page/n136/. An article by Ryan Quint on the ”Emerging Civil War” website adds some details, footnoted to the official records of the war. The article reveals the specific Gunnell farm. Quint explains that two weeks after 6 December and in connection with the battle at Dranesville, “Ord’s brigade had dropped off their wagons and foragers at the home of John Gunnell. Gunnell had been stamped as ‘a squire and noted secessionist’ and the federals used his farmland to draw their supplies from. The Federal soliders were already familiar with the area—every time they went on their expeditions, they went to Gunnell’s home, and two of Gunnell’s nephews had been arrested in conjunction with rounding up prisoners associated with the ambush at Lowe’s Island.” Quint’s article can be found here: https://archive.org/details/historypennsylv00esqgoog/page/n136/. Finally, to nail down the location of the John Gunnell farm: here’s the the National Register of Historical Places record that provides history, photos, and address: https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/69/6804/41680469/content/electronic-records/rg-079/NPS_VA/06001100.pdf. Presumably the house is still standing. There’s a 2012 color photo here: https://theclio.com/entry/168791. Hope this was helpful and best wishes!

  3. Karen Adams Speight says:

    Hello, I came across your site recently as I have continued to research my Family history. A Vienna resident until after college and with strong ties to the area I am the grand daughter of Charles P. Adams son of Thomas and Idella Adams. I would like to communicate with you regarding their property and it’s history. Look forward to hearing from you.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *